Capsule outputs admissible. The chain verifiable by your expert witness.
A substrate designed from the first line of code to survive both clinical scrutiny and an evidentiary hearing.
Admissibility is an architecture decision, not a litigation decision.
Most AI healthcare outputs cannot be put on the record because their provenance cannot be reconstructed. Lucy was built the opposite way: every output carries two cryptographic signatures (one classical, one post-quantum), a hash that links to every prior reasoning step, and a citation chain back to the named source that informed it. Your expert witness can verify the chain against published public keys without our cooperation.
An evidentiary package, on demand.
- A complete capsule chain for any patient interaction within scope, exported in a format your forensic team can verify independently.
- Named cryptographic primitives published on the public security page. See the table for the classical and post-quantum signatures used on every output.
- NIST-submission status and the standards posture for the capsule protocol, so an evidentiary hearing has a documented foundation to credit.
- Cooperation with class-action discovery on a paid-engagement basis where the dataset crosses an institution-by-institution threshold of complaints.
Adversarial-by-default is the feature, not the bug.
The audit chain is not a vendor-attested promise. It is a cryptographic primitive. If a defendant institution disputes a Lucy output, the chain is the arbiter. If a plaintiff disputes an institution's reading of a Lucy output, the chain is again the arbiter. The substrate is not on either side.
A specific offer
We will hand you a sample capsule chain in a sealed envelope, by mail, on request. Your forensic team verifies it before any call is taken.